4.4 Article

Perspectives on machine learning-augmented Reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulation models of turbulence

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.050504

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF CBET program [1507928]
  2. ONR Subsurface Hydrodynamics program [N00014-17-1-2200]
  3. NASA TTT program [80NSSC18M0149]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews recent developments in using machine learning to enhance Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) models of turbulent flows, emphasizing the importance of consistent ML augmentation in modeling. It discusses techniques for promoting model-consistent training and choosing the feature space based on physical and mathematical considerations, highlighting the potential of machine learning in turbulence modeling.
This work presents a review and perspectives on recent developments in the use of machine learning (ML) to augment Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) models of turbulent flows. Different approaches of applying supervised learning to represent unclosed terms, model discrepancies, and subfilter scales are discussed in the context of RANS and LES modeling. Particular emphasis is placed on the impact of the training procedure on the consistency of ML augmentations with the underlying physical model. Techniques to promote model-consistent training, and to avoid the requirement of full fields of direct numerical simulation data are detailed. This is followed by a discussion of physics-informed and mathematical considerations on the choice of the feature space, and imposition of constraints on the ML model. With a view towards developing generalizable ML-augmented RANS and LES models, outstanding challenges are discussed, and perspectives are provided. While the promise of ML-augmented turbulence modeling is clear, and successes have been demonstrated in isolated scenarios, a general consensus of this paper is that truly generalizable models require model-consistent training with careful characterization of underlying assumptions and imposition of physically and mathematically informed priors and constraints to account for the inevitable shortage of data relevant to predictions of interest. Thus, machine learning should be viewed as one tool in the turbulence modeler's toolkit. This modeling endeavor requires multidisciplinary advances, and thus the target audience for this paper is the fluid mechanics community, as well as the computational science and machine learning communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available