4.7 Article

Understanding barriers and enablers of electric vehicles in urban freight transport: Addressing stakeholder needs in Turkey

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102794

Keywords

Electric vehicles; Urban freight transport; City logistics

Funding

  1. ERA-NET Cofund Electric Mobility Europe (EMEurope)
  2. European Commission [723977]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [723977] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electric Freight Vehicles (EFVs) have great potential for reducing emissions and noise pollution in urban freight transport, but their market share in commercial fleets is limited by technical issues and a lack of easily accessible information on adoption factors.
Electric Freight Vehicles (EFVs) have a strong potential for urban freight transport and city logistics. Depending on the way electricity is produced, the deployment of EFVs could significantly reduce exhaust emissions and noise pollution in cities. However, the market share of EFVs in commercial fleets is far below the potential. There is also a lack of knowledge on specific technical and organizational issues faced by EFV adopters, particularly who are at an early stage of adoption. The aim of this paper is to obtain an in-depth understanding of the factors that influence the adoption of EFVs in urban freight transport fleets in Turkey. The analysis is based on review of literature and the feedback gathered from a workshop with relevant stakeholders, as a part of the activities realized under EUFAL (Electric urban freight and logistics) project, realized under the ERA-NET Cofound Electric Mobility Europe. The evaluation of workshop results shows that besides some persistent technical and operational issues, EFV adoption is limited by a clear lack of easily available and reliable information on factors affecting the EFV adoption decision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available