4.6 Article

Corrosion Behavior of AA 1100 Anodized in Gallic-Sulfuric Acid Solution

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11040405

Keywords

aluminum anodization; gallic acid; corrosion resistance; electrolyte; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of gallic acid as an additive in sulfuric acid anodization can improve the corrosion resistance of anodized aluminum, but higher current density may lead to decreased corrosion resistance. Under certain conditions, adding low concentrations of gallic acid can result in better corrosion performance of anodized aluminum samples.
Sulfuric acid anodization is one of the common methods used to improve corrosion resistance of aluminum alloys. Organic acids can be added to the sulfuric acid electrolyte in order to improve the properties of the anodized aluminum produced. In this study, the use of gallic acid as an additive to the sulfuric acid anodization of AA1100 was explored. The effect of varying anodization current density and gallic acid concentration on the properties of anodized aluminum samples was observed using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, linear polarization, and scanning electron microscopy. It was observed that the corrosion resistance of samples anodized in gallic-sulfuric acid solution at 10 mA center dot cm(-2) is lower than samples anodized in sulfuric acid. It was also observed that higher anodization current density can lead to lower corrosion resistances for aluminum samples anodized in gallic-sulfuric acid solution. However, samples anodized at 5 mA center dot cm(-2) and at a gallic acid concentration of 5 g center dot L-1 showed better corrosion performance than the samples anodized in sulfuric acid only. This suggests that the use of low amounts of gallic acid as an additive for sulfuric acid anodization can lead to better corrosion resistances for anodized aluminum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available