4.6 Article

Protection of Stone Monuments Using a Brushing Treatment with Ammonium Oxalate

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11040379

Keywords

ammonium oxalate; calcium oxalate; stone monuments; synchrotron based µ XRD; synchrotron based µ XRF

Funding

  1. FWO IRI [I001919N]
  2. IAEA CRP1917 RC [18227]
  3. European Regional Development Fund for the 'Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials and Sensing Devices' [KK.01.1.1.01.0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stone monuments and buildings are prone to weathering, prompting the proposal of protective coatings inhibiting calcite dissolution on limestone and marble surfaces. Research showed that stones with different porosities developed varying thicknesses of protective layers after treatment with ammonium oxalate.
Stone monuments and buildings are susceptible to weathering. Carbonate-based stones are especially vulnerable in acidic environments, whereas magmatic acidic stones are more susceptible to chemical weathering in basic environments. To slow down surface corrosion of limestone and marble artworks/buildings, protective coatings which inhibit calcite dissolution have been proposed. In this work, samples from two stone types with different porosity were treated with ammonium oxalate (AmOx) to create a protective layer of calcium oxalate (CaOx) using the previously developed brushing method. Two different synchrotron microscopy experiments were performed to determine its protective capability. X-ray powder diffraction (SR-mu-XRPD) in transmission geometry allowed visualization of the distributions of calcium carbonate and oxalates along the sample depths. In a second step, X-ray fluorescence (SR-mu-XRF) was used to check the efficiency/integrity of the protective surface coating layer. This was done by measuring the sulfur distribution on the stone surface after exposing the protected stones to sulfuric acid. XRPD showed the formation of a protective oxalate layer with a thickness of 5-15 mu m on the less porous stone, while a 20-30 mu m thick layer formed on the more porous stone. The XRF study showed that the optimal treatment time depends on the stone porosity. Increasing the treatment time from 1 to 3 h resulted in a decreased efficiency of the protective layer for the low porosity stone. We assume that this is due to the formation of vertical channels (cracks) in the protective layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available