4.6 Article

Framing in multiple public goods games and donation to charities

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.202117

Keywords

evolutionary game theory; cooperation; altruism; experiments

Funding

  1. MINECO (Spain)
  2. FEDER funds [FIS2017-87519-P, FJCI-2016-28276]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades/FEDER (Spain/UE) [PGC2018-098186-B-I00]
  4. Comunidad de Madrid [PRACTICO-CM]
  5. Comunidad de Madrid/Universidad Carlos III de Madrid [CAVTIONS-CM-UC3M]
  6. Comunidad de Aragon (Spain) [E36-20R]
  7. EU [317532, 640772]
  8. Spanish State Research Agency
  9. FEDER funds, through the Maria de Maeztu Program for Units of Excellence in RD [MDM-2017-0711, RTI2018093732-B-C22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has shown that contributions to public goods can be influenced by different framing conditions. Specifically, people are more willing to contribute when social donations are presented as indirect donations. Women tend to contribute more to public goods and donate more to charity compared to men.
The vast amount of research devoted to public goods games has shown that contributions may be dramatically affected by varying framing conditions. This is particularly relevant in the context of donations to charities and non-governmental organizations. Here, we design a multiple public goods experiment by introducing five types of funds, each differing in the fraction of the contribution that is donated to a charity. We found that people contribute more to public goods when the associated social donations are presented as indirect rather than as direct donations. At the same time, the fraction of the donations devoted to charity is not affected by the framing. We have also found that, on average, women contribute to public goods and donate to charity significantly more than men. These findings are of potential interest to the design of social investment tools, in particular for charities to ask for better institutional designs from policy makers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available