4.7 Article

Characterization of the plasticity parameters of the surface-modified layer of 18CrNiMo7-6 alloy steel after carburizing heat treatment through the indentation method

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 2307-2316

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.028

Keywords

Indentation test; Surface-modified layers; Plasticity parameters; Yield strength; Hardening index

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1804254, 11702252, 51801187]
  2. Important Science & Technology Specific Projects of Henan Province [201400211200]
  3. Key Teachers Program for the University of Henan Province [2019GGJS005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes an indentation method combined with finite element simulation to analyze the plastic parameters of the surface-modified layer (SML). Experimental results on 18CrNiMo7-6 alloy steel show that the hardening index and yield strength of SML decrease along the depth after heat treatment, which is consistent with tensile test results.
A surface-modified layer (SML) can play an important role in the durability and in-service behavior of key components, but characterization of the mechanical properties of SML is complex. In this paper, an indentation method to characterize the plastic parameters of the SML is proposed. The method combines indentation tests and finite element simulation to analyze the plastic parameters of the SML. The yield strength and hardening index of the SML for 18CrNiMo7-6 alloy steel, before and after heat treatment, were characterized using the proposed method. After heat treatment, the yield strength and hardening index decreased gradually along the depth. The results obtained agree with the tensile test results. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available