4.7 Article

ResNet-Like Belief-Propagation Decoding for Polar Codes

Journal

IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 934-937

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LWC.2021.3050819

Keywords

Decoding; Damping; Iterative decoding; Polar codes; Computer architecture; Standards; Performance gain; Polar codes; neural network; belief propagation; damping factor

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFE0205501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62071058, 62001049]
  3. China Post-Doctoral Science Foundation [2019M660032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This letter introduces a ResNet-like BP architecture and applies trainable damping factors to enhance standard polar BP decoding, showing improved error correction performance and accelerated convergence.
The polar neural decoder has a performance improvement at the cost of additional storage and computation. In this letter, we first propose a ResNet-like BP architecture to improve the standard polar BP decoding. Each iteration inherits a portion of information from the previous iteration as additional input and passes its output to the next iteration. Second, trainable damping factors, which can be learned through deep learning techniques, are applied to determine the inheritance ratio in the ResNet-like BP. We allocate the damping factors flexibly and demonstrate the optimization of a shared constant damping factor provides the same level of performance with the individual optimization of the damping factor at each state. Moreover, we qualitatively explain the performance gain by analyzing the mutual information between the input and output of the decoder. Numerical and simulation results indicate that the ResNet-like BP decoder can effectively improve the error correction performance and accelerate convergence compared with the standard polar BP algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available