4.6 Article

A Rocket-Triggered Lightning Flash Containing Negative-Positive-Negative Current Polarity Reversal During Its Initial Stage

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JD033187

Keywords

cloud charge structure; current polarity reversal; recoil leader; rocket-triggered lightning; very-high-frequency interferometer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41875008, 41775012, 41630425]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1501502]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of a rocket-triggered lightning flash revealed multiple instances of current polarity reversal, such as negative to positive to negative transitions. The flash occurred in a transition zone between convective and stratiform regions, providing a unique observational opportunity.
A rocket-triggered lightning flash containing negative-positive-negative current polarity reversal during its initial stage is analyzed using multiple synchronized observation data. The flash was triggered under a thunderstorm transition zone between the convective region and the stratiform region. The upward positive leader branched and developed toward the stratiform region. When the negative initial continuous current was decreasing, a negative stepped leader was transformed from a recoil leader on a preexisting positive branch. As the negative leader developed toward the convective region, a breakdown process initiated on a preexisting positive channel and propagated toward the back end of the negative stepped leader, accompanied with a positive electric field change pulse. The current polarity changed from negative to positive about 0.22 ms after the onset of the breakdown process. The negative leader terminated after propagating for 71.08 ms, while scattered discharges on other positive branches maintained to develop, and then the ICC polarity changed from positive to negative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available