4.6 Review

ICD-11 Personality Disorders: Utility and Implications of the New Model

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.655548

Keywords

personality disorder; classification; domains; diagnosis; ICD-11

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ICD-11 classification of personality disorders represents a paradigm shift in diagnosis, abolishing all previous categories except for a general description of personality disorder and allowing for specification of severity. It describes patient behavior using five personality trait domains and shows alignment with the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Early evidence on the reliability and validity of the new model is promising, but wider adoption by clinicians in regular clinical practice is needed for its success.
The ICD-11 classification of personality disorders represents a paradigm shift in diagnosis. This was felt necessary because previous personality disorder classifications had major problems. These included unnecessary complexity, inconsistency with data on normal personality traits, and minimal consideration of severity despite this being shown to be the major predictor of outcome. The ICD-11 classification abolishes all categories of personality disorder except for a general description of personality disorder. This diagnosis can be further specified as mild, moderate, or severe. Patient behavior can be described using one or more of five personality trait domains; negative affectivity, dissociality, anankastia, detachment, and disinhibition. Clinicians may also specify a borderline pattern qualifier. The ICD-11 shows considerable alignment with the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Early evidence around the reliability and validity of the new model appear promising, although at present there is still limited specific evidence due to the model being so recently finalized. However, for the model to be successful, it needs to be embraced by clinicians and used widely in normal clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available