4.6 Review

Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR-IB criteria

Journal

ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 1528-1542

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51320

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  2. UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  3. UK Department of Health's Biomedical Research Centres
  4. UK Epilepsy Society
  5. Dr. Marvin Weil Epilepsy Research Fund
  6. Christelijke Vereniging voor de Verpleging van Lijders aan Epilepsie, Netherlands
  7. Dutch MS Research Foundation [18-1027]
  8. Medical Research Council through a Clinical Research Training Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial intelligence-based diagnostic algorithms have made ambitious achievements in the field of neurological disorders, particularly in utilizing scalable imaging technology like optical coherence tomography (OCT). By embedding quality control criteria into OCT reporting guidelines, machine learning in this area is advanced, showing significant progress in the diagnosis of neurological conditions.
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostic algorithms have achieved ambitious aims through automated image pattern recognition. For neurological disorders, this includes neurodegeneration and inflammation. Scalable imaging technology for big data in neurology is optical coherence tomography (OCT). We highlight that OCT changes observed in the retina, as a window to the brain, are small, requiring rigorous quality control pipelines. There are existing tools for this purpose. Firstly, there are human-led validated consensus quality control criteria (OSCAR-IB) for OCT. Secondly, these criteria are embedded into OCT reporting guidelines (APOSTEL). The use of the described annotation of failed OCT scans advances machine learning. This is illustrated through the present review of the advantages and disadvantages of AI-based applications to OCT data. The neurological conditions reviewed here for the use of big data include Alzheimer disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson disease, and epilepsy. It is noted that while big data is relevant for AI, ownership is complex. For this reason, we also reached out to involve representatives from patient organizations and the public domain in addition to clinical and research centers. The evidence reviewed can be grouped in a five-point expansion of the OSCAR-IB criteria to embrace AI (OSCAR-AI). The review concludes by specific recommendations on how this can be achieved practically and in compliance with existing guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available