4.7 Article

Modeling the complete kinetics of coxsackievirus B3 reveals human determinants of host-cell feedback

Journal

CELL SYSTEMS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 304-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.02.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. David and Lucile Packard Foundation [2009-34710]
  2. University of Virginia cardiovascular training grant [T32-HL007284]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we encoded the complete kinetics of infection for coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), and found that cleavability of the dsRNA transducer MAVS becomes a stronger determinant of viral outcomes when cells receive supplemental interferon after infection. These observations are consistent with a simple nonlinear model of MAVS regulation.
Complete kinetic models are pervasive in chemistry but lacking in biological systems. We encoded the complete kinetics of infection for coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), a compact and fast-acting RNA virus. The model consists of separable, detailed modules describing viral binding-delivery, translation-replication, and encapsidation. Specific module activities are dampened by the type I interferon response to viral double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs), which is itself disrupted by viral proteinases. The experimentally validated kinetics uncovered that cleavability of the dsRNA transducer mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) becomes a stronger determinant of viral outcomes when cells receive supplemental interferon after infection. Cleavability is naturally altered in humans by a common MAVS polymorphism, which removes a proteinase-targeted site but paradoxically elevates CVB3 infectivity. These observations are reconciled with a simple nonlinear model of MAVS regulation. Modeling complete kinetics is an attainable goal for small, rapidly infecting viruses and perhaps viral pathogens more broadly. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the Supplemental information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available