4.8 Review

Autoantibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.685312

Keywords

rheumatoid arthritis; rheumatoid factor; ACPA; anti-CCP; diagnosis; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Rheumatism Association [R-932093, R-941284, R-931340]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2019-01632, 2015-02228]
  3. King Gustav V 80-year foundation [FAI2019-0577, FAI 2019-0586]
  4. Swedish Research Council [2019-01632] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurement of autoantibodies like RF and ACPA is crucial in the diagnosis and treatment of RA, but lack of harmonization between different commercial tests poses a challenge. It is recommended that all RF and ACPA tests should have a diagnostic specificity of 98-99%, and the introduction of test result-specific likelihood ratios can provide more precise information for clinical decision-making. Detection of autoantibodies can also be used to predict future arthritis development and prognosis in at-risk patients.
Measurement of two groups of autoantibodies, rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) have gained increasing significance in the diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the last 65 years. Despite this rising importance of autoimmune serology in RA, there is a palpable lack of harmonization between different commercial RF and ACPA tests. While a minimal diagnostic specificity has been defined for RF tests, which almost always are related to an international reference preparation, neither of this applies to ACPA. Especially assays with low diagnostic specificity are associated with very low positive predictive values or post-test probabilities in real world settings. In this review we focus on issues of practical bearing for the clinical physician diagnosing patients who potentially have RA, or treating patients diagnosed with RA. We advocate that all clinically used assays for RF and ACPA should be aligned to a common diagnostic specificity of 98-99% compared to healthy controls. This high and rather narrow interval corresponds to the diagnostic specificity seen for many commercial ACPA tests, and represents a specificity that is higher than what is customary for most RF assays. Data on antibody occurrence harmonized in this way should be accompanied by test result-specific likelihood ratios for the target diagnosis RA on an ordinal or interval scale, which will provide the clinical physician with more granular and richer information than merely relating numerical values to a single cut-off point. As many physicians today are used to evaluate autoantibodies as positive or negative on a nominal scale, the introduction of test result-specific likelihood ratios will require a change in clinical mindset. We also discuss the use of autoantibodies to prognosticate future arthritis development in at-risk patients as well as predict severe disease course and outcome of pharmacological treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available