4.8 Review

Hidden in Plain View: Discovery of Chimeric Diabetogenic CD4 T Cell Neo-Epitopes

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.669986

Keywords

antigen presenting cell; transpeptidation; immune tolerance; type 1 diabetes mellitus; chimeric peptide; CD4 T cell; beta cell; antigen

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32 AI 074491, P01 AI-118688]
  2. Intersect Fellowship Program for Computational Scientists and Immunologists from the American Association of Immunologists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The search for T cell antigens driving T1D has been ongoing for over three decades. Recent research has revealed that many important MHCII-presented epitopes are actually fusions of peptide fragments from different proteins, attributed to a process called reverse proteolysis.
The T cell antigens driving autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) have been pursued for more than three decades. When diabetogenic CD4 T cell clones and their relevant MHCII antigen presenting alleles were first identified in rodents and humans, the path to discovering the peptide epitopes within pancreatic beta cell proteins seemed straightforward. However, as experimental results accumulated, definitive data were often absent or controversial. Work within the last decade has helped to clear up some of the controversy by demonstrating that a number of the important MHCII presented epitopes are not encoded in the natural beta cell proteins, but in fact are fusions between peptide fragments derived from the same or different proteins. Recently, the mechanism for generating these MHCII diabetogenic chimeric epitopes has been attributed to a form of reverse proteolysis, called transpeptidation, a process that has been well-documented in the production of MHCI presented epitopes. In this mini-review we summarize these data and their implications for T1D and other autoimmune responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available