4.6 Article

Characterization of Geometry and Surface Texture of AlSi10Mg Laser Powder Bed Fusion Channels Using X-ray Computed Tomography

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11094304

Keywords

powder bed fusion; AlSi10Mg; cooling channels; channel characterization; X-ray computed tomography; surface texture analysis

Funding

  1. Innovation Fund Denmark Grand Solutions project MADE Digital [6151-000068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a qualitative analysis of the surface texture of AlSi10Mg channels using X-ray computed tomography and found profile parameters that can be used for characterizing surface texture variations. Additionally, a method for predicting the equivalent diameter of unobstructed cross-sectional area and an empirical model for predicting roughness and internal geometry were presented.
Channels manufactured by laser powder bed fusion have an inherent process-induced dross formation and surface texture that require proper characterization for design and process optimization. This work undertakes surface texture characterization of AlSi10Mg channels of nominal diameter sizes ranging from 1 mm to 9 mm using X-ray computed tomography. Profile parameters, including Pa, Pz, and Pq, were found to be interchangeable for qualitative characterization of surface texture variation. Psk, Pvv, and the fractal dimension could identify the presence of extreme dross and sintered particles on the measured profiles. A method for predicting the equivalent diameter of the unobstructed cross-sectional area (D-eq) was presented and its reduction was found to follow a logarithmic trend, as a function of channel length. An empirical model Pa (beta, D), as a function of local angular position (beta) and channel diameter (D), was demonstrated on a perfect channel geometry, resulting in well-predicted roughness and internal geometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available