4.7 Article

Rejection of randomly coinciding events in Li2100MoO4 scintillating bolometers using light detectors based on the Neganov-Luke effect

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4565-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IDEATE International Associated Laboratory (LIA)
  2. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [4-2015]
  3. Universite Paris-Sud as missionaire scientifique invite
  4. P2IO LabEx [ANR-10-LABX-0038, ANR-11-IDEX-0003-01]
  5. LUMINEU from the ANR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Random coincidences of nuclear events can be one of the main background sources in low-temperature calorimetric experiments looking for neutrinoless double-beta decay, especially in those searches based on scintillating bolometers embedding the promising double-beta candidate (100) Mo, because of the relatively short half-life of the two-neutrino double-beta decay of this nucleus. We show in this work that randomly coinciding events of the two-neutrino double-beta decay of (100) Mo in enriched Li-2(100) MoO4 detectors can be effectively discriminated by pulse-shape analysis in the light channel if the scintillating bolometer is provided with a Neganov-Luke light detector, which can improve the signal-to-noise ratio by a large factor, assumed here at the level of similar to 750 on the basis of preliminary experimental results obtained with these devices. The achieved pile-up rejection efficiency results in a very low contribution, of the order of similar to 6 x 10(-5) counts/( keV.kg.y), to the background counting rate in the region of interest for a large volume (similar to 90 cm(3)) Li-2(100) MoO4 detector. This background level is very encouraging in view of a possible use of the Li-2(100) MoO4 solution for a bolometric tonne-scale next-generation experiment as that proposed in the CUPID project.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available