4.7 Article

Reduced off-target effect of NG-BE4max by using NG-HiFi system

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY-NUCLEIC ACIDS
Volume 25, Issue -, Pages 168-172

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.05.012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational Research [2017YFA0105101]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_16R32]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA16030501, XDA16030503]
  4. Key Research & Development Program of Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory [2018GZR110104004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recently developed high-fidelity base editor, NGHiFi, showed improved on-target activity while significantly reducing off-target effects compared to NG-BE4max in Hoxc13-ablated rabbits. This enhanced specificity and reduced off-target effects of SpCas9-NG in cytidine base editing with NGHiFi system offer a promising tool for precise modeling of human diseases in rabbits.
Recently, a rationally engineered SpCas9 variant (SpCas9-NG) that can recognize a minimal NG protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) was reported to expand the targeting scope in genome editing. However, increased genome-wide off-target mutations with this variant compared with SpCas9 were reported in previous studies. In addition, lower base editing frequencies and higher unintended off-target mutations were also found in Hoxc13-ablated rabbits generated by NG-BE4max in our study. Here, a high-fidelity base editor, NGHiFi, in comparison to NG-BE4max, showed retention of on-target activity while exhibiting significantly decreased off-target activity in Hoxc13-ablated rabbits. Collectively, the improved specificity and reduced off-target effect of SpCas9-NG assisted in cytidine base editing with the NGHiFi system, providing a promising tool to precisely model human diseases in rabbits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available