4.5 Article

Experimental Investigation of Al-CuMgMn Alloy Developed by Laser Beam Surface Modification for Wear Resistance

Journal

METALS
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11050712

Keywords

surface modification; wear resistance; coefficient of friction; hardness; Lancaster wear coefficient

Funding

  1. NORHED II project INDMET grant [62862]
  2. University of Stavanger

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser surface alloying, using different alloy powders with CO2 laser at 1.7 kW power, significantly increased the hardness of Al-CuMgMn alloy zones by 2 to 7 times, while reducing wear by 30-50%. Microstructure and surface morphology studies showed good metallurgical bonding without defects, and statistical analysis matched with an asperity-based model.
Laser surface alloying is one of the recent technologies used in the manufacturing sector for improving the surface properties of metals. Aluminum alloys are key materials in the manufacturing sector. This favors their high demand in many industries. In this study investigation, the surface alloying of pure aluminum was conducted using a CO2 laser. Four types of alloying powders were used with a 2:1:1 combination of copper, magnesium, and manganese. The hardness of the alloyed zones of Al-CuMgMn increased by 2 to 7 times at a 1.7 kW processing laser power. To assess the rate of wear for the alloyed samples, a modified Lancaster wear coefficient was considered. When the pin-on-disc wear test at 10 N and 20 N loads was analyzed with different sliding speeds, a reduction in wear by 30-50% appeared due to surface alloying. The result shows good insight into the wear behavior. In the same way, microstructure and surface morphology studies displayed a good metallurgical bonding without defects. In a statistical sense, the friction and wear behavior matched with an asperity-based model. The experimental results revealed that laser surface alloy has more wear resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available