4.6 Article

Effect of a Birthing on Country service redesign on maternal and neonatal health outcomes for First Nations Australians: a prospective, non-randomised, interventional trial

Journal

LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages E651-E659

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00061-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council partnership [1077036]
  2. Institute for Urban Indigenous Health
  3. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Health Service Brisbane
  4. Mater Mothers Hospital
  5. Queensland Government
  6. Charles Darwin University
  7. Mater Research Institute
  8. University of Queensland
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1077036] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of the BiOC service in improving maternal and infant health outcomes in Indigenous communities. Implementation of this service significantly increased the number of antenatal visits attended by pregnant women, reduced the rate of preterm birth, and increased the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge for mothers.
Background There is an urgency to redress unacceptable maternal and infant health outcomes for First Nations families in Australia. A multi-agency partnership between two Aboriginal Community-controlled health services and a tertiary hospital in urban Australia designed, implemented, and evaluated the new Birthing in Our Community (BiOC) service. In this study, we aimed to assess and report the clinical effectiveness of the BiOC service on key maternal and infant health outcomes compared with that of standard care. Methods Pregnant women attending the Mater Mothers Public Hospital (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) who were having a First Nations baby were invited to receive the BiOC service. In this prospective, non-randomised, interventional trial of the service, we specifically enrolled women who intended to birth at the study hospital, and had a referral from a family doctor or Aboriginal Medical Service. Participants were offered either standard care services or the BiOC service. Prespecified primary outcomes to test the effectiveness of the BiOC service versus standard care were the proportion of women attending five or more antenatal visits, smoking after 20 weeks of gestation, who had a preterm birth (<37 weeks), and who were exclusively breastfeeding at discharge from hospital. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance confounders and calculate treatment effect. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12618001365257. Findings Between Jan 1, 2013, and June 30, 2019, 1867 First Nations babies were born at the Mater Mothers Public Hospital. After exclusions, 1422 women received either standard care (656 participants) or the BiOC service (766 participants) and were included in the analyses. Women receiving the BiOC service were more likely to attend five or more antenatal visits (adjusted odds ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.09; p=0.0064), less likely to have an infant born preterm (0.62, 0.42-0 .93; p=0.019), and more likely to exclusively breastfeed on discharge from hospital (1.34, 1.06-1.70; p=0.014). No difference was found between the two groups for smoking after 20 weeks of gestation, with both showing a reduction compared with smoking levels reported at their hospital booking visit. Interpretation This study has shown the clinical effectiveness of the BiOC service, which was co-designed by stakeholders and underpinned by Birthing on Country principles. The widespread scale-up of this new service should be prioritised. Dedicated funding, knowledge translation, and implementation science are needed to ensure all First Nations families can access Birthing on Country services that are adapted for their specific contexts. Copyright (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available