4.6 Article

Genome Size Diversity in Rare, Endangered, and Protected Orchids in Poland

Journal

GENES
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12040563

Keywords

flow cytometry; nuclear DNA content; Orchidaceae; propidium iodide; threatened species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Orchidaceae is one of the largest and most widespread plant families, with genome size estimation by flow cytometry revealing that the investigated orchid species possess intermediate, large, and very large genomes. The study estimated the genome sizes of 15 orchid species and one infraspecific taxon growing wild in Poland, providing additional criterion for orchid species identification and characterization.
Orchidaceae is one of the largest and the most widespread plant families with many species threatened with extinction. However, only about 1.5% of orchids' genome sizes have been known so far. The aim of this study was to estimate the genome size of 15 species and one infraspecific taxon of endangered and protected orchids growing wild in Poland to assess their variability and develop additional criterion useful in orchid species identification and characterization. Flow cytometric genome size estimation revealed that investigated orchid species possessed intermediate, large, and very large genomes. The smallest 2C DNA content possessed Liparis loeselii (14.15 pg), while the largest Cypripedium calceolus (82.10 pg). It was confirmed that the genome size is characteristic to the subfamily. Additionally, for four species Epipactis albensis, Ophrys insectifera, Orchis mascula, Orchis militaris and one infraspecific taxon, Epipactis purpurata f. chlorophylla the 2C DNA content has been estimated for the first time. Genome size estimation by flow cytometry proved to be a useful auxiliary method for quick orchid species identification and characterization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available