4.6 Article

Identification of Novel Candidate Genes and Variants for Hearing Loss and Temporal Bone Anomalies

Journal

GENES
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12040566

Keywords

anomalies; CBLN3; cochlear implant; enlarged vestibular aqueduct; GDPD5; genetic testing; hearing loss; inner ear; IST1; malformations; temporal bone

Funding

  1. [PCHRD-DOST FP150010]
  2. [UP Manila-NIH 2008-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study highlights the importance of identifying novel variants and genes in ethnic groups that are understudied for hearing loss, which can improve the utility of clinical genetic screening for hearing loss, predict outcomes of hearing rehabilitation, and mitigate the long-term effects of comorbidities.
Background: Hearing loss remains an important global health problem that is potentially addressed through early identification of a genetic etiology, which helps to predict outcomes of hearing rehabilitation such as cochlear implantation and also to mitigate the long-term effects of comorbidities. The identification of variants for hearing loss and detailed descriptions of clinical phenotypes in patients from various populations are needed to improve the utility of clinical genetic screening for hearing loss. Methods: Clinical and exome data from 15 children with hearing loss were reviewed. Standard tools for annotating variants were used and rare, putatively deleterious variants were selected from the exome data. Results: In 15 children, 21 rare damaging variants in 17 genes were identified, including: 14 known hearing loss or neurodevelopmental genes, 11 of which had novel variants; and three candidate genes IST1, CBLN3 and GDPD5, two of which were identified in children with both hearing loss and enlarged vestibular aqueducts. Patients with variants within IST1 and MYO18B had poorer outcomes after cochlear implantation. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of identifying novel variants and genes in ethnic groups that are understudied for hearing loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available