4.6 Article

Work-Related Mental Health Issues in Graduate Student Population

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.593562

Keywords

graduate students; mental health; well-being; burnout; cortisol; HPA axis (hypothalamus– pituitary– adrenal); engagement

Categories

Funding

  1. Siglo 21 University
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Cordoba

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that a significant number of graduate students are experiencing work-related mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and high burnout, with the amount of time spent in academia playing an important role. Graduate students exhibit a specific profile of work-related mental health issues, including alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and lower levels of work engagement. Additionally, graduate students are equally stressed as general workers, but with less work engagement and more symptoms of anxiety and depression.
The scientific and educational community is becoming increasingly aware of the impact of current academic working conditions on graduate students' mental health and how this is affecting scientific progress and ultimately society as a whole. Our study aimed to shed light on the work-related mental health issues affecting graduate students, providing a comprehensive research work including psychological and biological assessment. Our findings showed that a sizeable number of graduate student present anxiety, depression, or high burnout and that the time spent in academia plays an important role. The graduate student population displayed a specific work-related mental health issues profile with an altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and low levels of work engagement. Finally, graduate students were equally stressed, with less work engagement, and more anxious and depressed than general workers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available