4.6 Article

Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Produces Cross-Modal Improvements in Visual Thresholds

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.640984

Keywords

GVS; stochastic resonance (SR); cross-modal; in-channel; visual thresholds; white noise

Categories

Funding

  1. Translational Research Institute through NASA [NNX16AO69A, T0402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Galvanic vestibular white noise can improve visual thresholds but does not have an effect on auditory thresholds. Individuals with higher visual thresholds without stimulation showed greater improvement.
Background Stochastic resonance (SR) refers to a faint signal being enhanced with the addition of white noise. Previous studies have found that vestibular perceptual thresholds are lowered with noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (i.e., in-channel SR). Auditory white noise has been shown to improve tactile and visual thresholds, suggesting cross-modal SR. Objective We investigated galvanic vestibular white noise (nGVS) (n = 9 subjects) to determine the cross-modal effects on visual and auditory thresholds. Methods We measured auditory and visual perceptual thresholds of human subjects across a swath of different nGVS levels in order to determine if some individual-subject determined best nGVS level elicited a reduction in thresholds as compared the no noise condition (sham). Results We found improvement in visual thresholds (by an average of 18%, p = 0.014). Subjects with higher (worse) visual thresholds with no stimulation (sham) improved more than those with lower thresholds (p = 0.04). Auditory thresholds were unchanged by vestibular stimulation. Conclusion These results are the first demonstration of cross-modal improvement with galvanic vestibular stimulation, indicating galvanic vestibular white noise can produce cross-modal improvements in some sensory channels, but not all.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available