4.3 Article

ACK1 is dispensable for development, skin tumor formation, and breast cancer cell proliferation

Journal

FEBS OPEN BIO
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 1579-1592

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.13149

Keywords

ACK1; development; skin tumor

Funding

  1. University of Copenhagen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research found that the lack of the ACK1 gene in mice and breast cancer cell lines does not have a major impact on development, tissue maintenance, tumor formation, and cell migration.
Activated Cdc42-associated kinase 1 (ACK1), a widely expressed nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, is often amplified in cancer and has been shown to interact with Cell division cycle 42 (Cdc42), Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and several other cancer-relevant molecules, suggesting a possible role for ACK1 in development and tumor formation. To directly address this scenario, we generated mice lacking a functional ACK1 gene (ACK1 ko) using CRISPR genome editing. ACK1 ko mice developed normally, displayed no obvious defect in tissue maintenance, and were fertile. Primary ACK1-null keratinocytes showed normal phosphorylation of EGFR, but a tendency toward reduced activation of AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 (Akt) and Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (Erk). DMBA/TPA-induced skin tumor formation did not reveal significant differences between ACK1 ko and control mice. Deletion of the ACK1 gene in the breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, 67NR, MCF7, 4T1, and T47D caused no differences in growth. Furthermore, EGF-induced phosphorylation kinetics of Erk, Akt, and p130Cas were not detectably altered in T47D cells by the loss of ACK1. Finally, loss of ACK1 in MDA-MB-231 and T47D breast cancer cells had a very limited or no effect on directed cell migration. These data do not support a major role for ACK1 in Cdc42 and EGFR signaling, development, or tumor formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available