4.5 Article

Interactive Competition Between Individual Diffusion Layers during Cyclic Voltammetry at Random Arrays of Band and Disk Electrodes: A Thorough Analysis Based on Global Simulations

Journal

CHEMELECTROCHEM
Volume 8, Issue 13, Pages 2413-2424

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.202100310

Keywords

random arrays of electrodes; Voronoi tessellation; cyclic voltammetry; modelling; flux lines; simulations

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. ENS - PSL University
  3. CNRS Institute of Chemistry (INC)
  4. CNRS INC
  5. Sino-French LIA CNRS NanoBioCatEchem
  6. Sorbonne University (UMR 8640 PASTEUR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study validates the theory developed by Amatore and Saveant 40 years ago for arrays of electroactive band or disk electrodes, demonstrating that competitive diffusion interaction between active sites leads to redistribution of diffusion layers and homogenization of solution volumes. The study also confirms the approximation that the voltammetric behavior of arrays of nanodisk electrodes is similar to that of independent cylindrical unit cells operating in parallel.
This work validates a posteriori the use of the theory developed ca. 40 years ago by Amatore and Saveant for regular arrays of electroactive band or disk electrodes. This theory has been profitably used and widely applied in more than 900 research papers for the treatment of the voltammetric responses of arrays of nanoelectroactive objects that were necessarily random by construction. In this work we show that competitive diffusion interaction between the active sites enforce redistribution of individual diffusion layer which homogenize dimensions of the solution volumes 'feeding' each active site. For arrays of nanodisk electrodes, it also validates the corresponding approximation assuming that its voltammetric behavior is to that afforded by identical independent cylindrical unit cells performing in parallel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available