4.6 Article

Ionothermal Synthesis of Triclinic SAPO-34 Zeolites

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11050616

Keywords

ionic liquid; ionothermal synthesis; SAPO-34; molecular sieve

Funding

  1. NSFC-Henan Talent Development Joint Fund [U1204215]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21802125]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2020-KF-23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A triclinic SAPO-34 molecular sieve was successfully synthesized and characterized using various analytical techniques. The study revealed that factors such as crystallization temperature, type of ionic liquid, and organic amines significantly affect the morphology of the molecular sieve.
A triclinic SAPO-34 molecular sieve was synthesized ionothermally. The as-synthesized products were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), fourier infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) and thermogravimetric (TG) analyses. The formation mechanism of the hierarchical porous triclinic SAPO-34 zeolites and the factors affecting the morphology of the SAPO-34 molecular sieve were investigated. The results show that the formation mechanism of the hierarchical pores is in accordance with Ostwald ripening theory, and the accumulation of grains constitutes the existence of mesopores and macropores. The crystallization temperature, ionic liquid type, and organic amines can effectively change the morphology and crystallinity of the SAPO-34 molecular sieve. The crystallization temperature, ionic liquid and template have great influence on the (111) crystal plane, thus affecting the morphology of the molecular sieve. Moreover, it can be proven through NMR and TG analyses that ionic liquids and organic amines can be used as structure directing agents together.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available