4.6 Review

Non-Covalent Interactions in Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Theoretical and Mechanistic Studies of Reactions Mediated by Dual H-Bond Donors, Bifunctional Squaramides, Thioureas and Related Catalysts

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11050569

Keywords

asymmetric synthesis; H-bonding; nonbonding interactions; density functional theory calculations; Michael addition; cycloadditions; anion-binding catalysis; cascade reactions; transition states; organocatalysis

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [UIDB/00100/2020]
  2. RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chiral bifunctional dual H-bond donor catalysts have become essential in organocatalysis, promoting various reactions with high yields and excellent stereoselectivities. Understanding their mechanisms and the origin of stereoselectivity can guide the development of more efficient catalysts for new transformations.
Chiral bifunctional dual H-bond donor catalysts have become one of the pillars of organocatalysis. They include squaramide, thiosquaramide, thiourea, urea, and even selenourea-based catalysts combined with chiral amines, cinchona alkaloids, sulfides, phosphines and more. They can promote several types of reactions affording products in very high yields and excellent stereoselectivities in many cases: conjugate additions, cycloadditions, the aldol and Henry reactions, the Morita-Baylis-Hilman reaction, even cascade reactions, among others. The desire to understand mechanisms and the quest for the origins of stereoselectivity, in attempts to find guidelines for developing more efficient catalysts for new transformations, has promoted many mechanistic and theoretical studies. In this review, we survey the literature published in this area since 2015.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available