4.5 Article

Patients' physical activity in stroke units in Latvia and Sweden

Journal

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2110

Keywords

observation; physical activities; stroke rehabilitation; stroke unit

Funding

  1. Swedish Research council [VR2017-00946]
  2. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  3. Swedish Brain Foundation, Promobila
  4. Swedish government [ALFGBG-718711]
  5. Swedish county councils: the ALF agreement [ALFGBG-718711]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study described the levels of physical activity in stroke patients in Sweden and Latvia, finding that patients spend most of the time in bed and alone. Patients in Sweden had higher physical activity levels and spent more time outside their bedroom.
Objective A prospective, observational study to describe levels of physical activity in patients with stroke in a comprehensive stroke unit in Sweden and Latvia, comparing data between countries. Methods The study was performed at stroke units in one hospital in Sweden (data were acquired over a 2-month period in 2017) and two hospitals in Latvia (data were acquired over a 3-month period between 2016 and 2017). Patients with stroke were observed for 1 min every 10 min. The level of physical activity, location, and the people present were noted at each time-point. Results A total of 27 patients were observed in Latvia and 25 patients in Sweden. Patients from both countries were in bed half of the time and spent the majority of the day in their bedroom and alone. Patients in Sweden had higher physical activity levels, spent more time outside their bedroom and spent more time with rehabilitation specialists and visitors. Conclusion Patients are inactive and alone for a majority of the time during hospitalization at a comprehensive stroke unit in both countries. There are differences in environment in the stroke unit between countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available