4.5 Article

ABO blood types and sepsis mortality

Journal

ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00844-2

Keywords

Anaesthesia; Blood type; Mortality; Sepsis; Septic shock; Intensive care

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [126]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Research Foundation for the Capital Region of Denmark [A6052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to determine if ABO blood types carry different risks of 30-day mortality, AKI, and endothelial damage in critically ill patients with sepsis. Results showed that patients with blood type B had lower 30-day mortality risk and less endothelial damage compared to those with blood type A, with no significant difference in the risk of AKI.
Background We aimed to determine if the ABO blood types carry different risks of 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and endothelial damage in critically ill patients with sepsis. This was a retrospective cohort study of three independent cohorts of critically ill patients from the United States and Scandinavia consisting of adults with septic shock. We compared the 30-day mortality across the blood types within each cohort and pooled the results in a meta-analysis. We also estimated the incidence of AKI and degree of endothelial damage, as measured by blood concentrations of soluble thrombomodulin and syndecan-1. Results We included 12,342 patients with severe sepsis. In a pooled analysis blood type B carried a slightly lower risk of 30-day all-cause mortality compared to non-blood type B (adjusted HR 0.88; 95%-CI 0.79-0.98; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the risk of AKI. Soluble thrombomodulin and syndecan-1 concentrations were lower in patients with blood type B and O compared to blood type A, suggesting less endothelial damage. Conclusion Septic patients with blood type B had less endothelial damage, and a small reduction in mortality. The exposure is, however, unmodifiable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available