4.6 Article

Optimizing Optical Tweezers Experiments for Magnetic Resonance Sensing with Nanodiamonds

Journal

ACS PHOTONICS
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 1214-1221

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00137

Keywords

nanodiamonds; optical tweezers; optically detected magnetic resonance; nanoscale sensing; nitrogen-vacancy center; quantum sensing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the requirements for high-quality optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) spectroscopy in a conventional gradient force optical tweezers using nanodiamonds containing nitrogen-vacancy (NV-) centers. The modulation of the infrared trapping laser during spectroscopic measurements is shown to substantially improve ODMR contrast. This technique allows for the resolution of NV- spin projections and inferring crystallographic orientation, which are essential for future magnetic sensing applications of optically trapped nanodiamonds.
In this Article we explore the requirements for enabling high quality optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) spectroscopy in a conventional gradient force optical tweezers using nanodiamonds containing nitrogen-vacancy (NV-) centers. We find that modulation of the infrared (1064 nm) trapping laser during spectroscopic measurements substantially improves the ODMR contrast compared with continuous wave trapping. The work is significant as it allows trapping and quantum sensing protocols to be performed in conditions where signal contrast is substantially reduced. We demonstrate the utility of the technique by resolving NV- spin projections within the ODMR spectrum. Manipulating the orientation of the nanodiamond via the trapping laser polarization, we observe changes in spectral features. Theoretical modeling then allows us to infer the crystallographic orientation of the NV-. This is an essential capability for future magnetic sensing applications of optically trapped nanodiamonds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available