4.5 Article

Approaches to Three-Way Decisions Based on the Evaluation of Probabilistic Linguistic Terms Sets

Journal

SYMMETRY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13050764

Keywords

three-way decisions; probability thresholds; probabilistic linguistic terms sets; equivalent model

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61876079]
  2. Foundation for Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong Province [2019WQNCXO27]
  3. Foundation of the 13th Five-Year Plan for Young Talents in Philosophy and Social Science of Guangdong Province
  4. Start-up Research Science Found of Shantou University
  5. GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020A1515110434]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research proposes a method based on PLTSs evaluations to determine probability thresholds and derive three-way decisions, which is validated by an example.
The method of determining probability thresholds of three-way decisions (3WDs) has always been the key of research, especially in the current environment with a large number of data and uncertainties. Among these problems, there will be correlation and similarity between them. In the light of these problems, the loss function with Probabilistic Linguistic Terms Sets (PLTSs) is introduced in the paper, and then we propose a PLTS evaluation-based approach to determine the thresholds and derive 3WDs. According to the definition and characters of PLTSs, the PLTSs loss function matrix is constructed firstly. Then using the equivalent model of Decision-theoretic rough sets (DTRSs), we construct the equivalent model (i.e., the alpha(opt)-model and the beta(opt)-model, which are symmtrical) and try to find the optimal solution to determine the thresholds. Based on that, we propose a novel three-way decision approach under PLTSs evaluations. Finally, the validity of the method is verified by an example.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available