4.5 Article

Entity Relation Extraction Based on Entity Indicators

Journal

SYMMETRY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13040539

Keywords

relation extraction; entity indicators; entity pair; neural networks

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1836205, 62066007, 62066008]
  2. Major Research Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [91746116]
  3. Major Special Science and Technology Projects of Guizhou Province [[2017]3002]
  4. Key Projects of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province [[2020] 1Z055]
  5. Project of Guizhou Province Graduate Research Fund [Qianjiaohe YJSCXJH[2019]102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces task-related entity indicators to enhance the performance of relation extraction through a deep neural network. The experimental results show that this method has outperformed other methods in F1 score on different corpora.
Relation extraction aims to extract semantic relationships between two specified named entities in a sentence. Because a sentence often contains several named entity pairs, a neural network is easily bewildered when learning a relation representation without position and semantic information about the considered entity pair. In this paper, instead of learning an abstract representation from raw inputs, task-related entity indicators are designed to enable a deep neural network to concentrate on the task-relevant information. By implanting entity indicators into a relation instance, the neural network is effective for encoding syntactic and semantic information about a relation instance. Organized, structured and unified entity indicators can make the similarity between sentences that possess the same or similar entity pair and the internal symmetry of one sentence more obviously. In the experiment, a systemic analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of entity indicators on relation extraction. This method has achieved state-of-the-art performance, exceeding the compared methods by more than 3.7%, 5.0% and 11.2% in F1 score on the ACE Chinese corpus, ACE English corpus and Chinese literature text corpus, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available