4.5 Article

A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction

Journal

SYMMETRY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13030485

Keywords

link prediction; knowledge graph embedding; knowledge graph completion; survey

Funding

  1. Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2019H0001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61702432]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China [20720180070]
  4. International Cooperation Projects of Fujian Province in China [2018I0016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge graphs are widely used in artificial intelligence, but their open nature often results in incompleteness, requiring the construction of a more comprehensive knowledge graph. Link prediction is a fundamental task in knowledge graph completion, utilizing existing relations to infer new ones. KG-embedding models have significantly advanced the state of the art in recent years.
Knowledge graphs (KGs) have been widely used in the field of artificial intelligence, such as in information retrieval, natural language processing, recommendation systems, etc. However, the open nature of KGs often implies that they are incomplete, having self-defects. This creates the need to build a more complete knowledge graph for enhancing the practical utilization of KGs. Link prediction is a fundamental task in knowledge graph completion that utilizes existing relations to infer new relations so as to build a more complete knowledge graph. Numerous methods have been proposed to perform the link-prediction task based on various representation techniques. Among them, KG-embedding models have significantly advanced the state of the art in the past few years. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey on KG-embedding models for link prediction in knowledge graphs. We first provide a theoretical analysis and comparison of existing methods proposed to date for generating KG embedding. Then, we investigate several representative models that are classified into five categories. Finally, we conducted experiments on two benchmark datasets to report comprehensive findings and provide some new insights into the strengths and weaknesses of existing models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available