4.6 Review

Research Trends in Career Success: A Bibliometric Review

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13094625

Keywords

professional success; objective success factors; subjective success factors

Funding

  1. CIPAT-ESPOL
  2. ESPOL University (Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral) [CIPAT-01-2018]
  3. NOVA Science Research Associates
  4. project of UTEQ Prediction and assessment of the professional success of university graduates [44]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides an overview of academic research on professional success using bibliometric analysis, revealing the exponential growth of the field and identifying main research themes and trends.
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of academic research on professional success, using the bibliometric analysis to understand the evolution of this field between the years 1990 and 2020. The information was obtained from the publications indexed in the Scopus database, under a rigorous bibliometric process that comprises five parts: (i) criteria search of the field, (ii) selection of database and documents, (iii) inclusion and selection criteria, (iv) software and data selection, and (v) analysis and results. The results show professional success as a scientific discipline in full exponential growth, which allows us to consider the main contributions of authors, institutions, and international contributions, as well as to consider the main themes that have shaped the intellectual structure of the subject through their visualization using bibliometric maps of co-citation and co-occurrence, which combined showed eight main lines of research. The results obtained allowed us to identify patterns of convergence and divergence in various topics, which allows obtaining current and diverse information on the state of the research field's art.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available