4.6 Article

What Impacts Socially Responsible Consumption?

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13084258

Keywords

affective commitment; perceived efficacy; materialism; socially responsible consumer

Funding

  1. University of Malaga

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the factors related to socially responsible consumption and finds that socio-demographic factors, consumer behavior types, perceived efficacy, affective commitment, and materialism play a significant role in influencing socially responsible consumption. Specifically, the purchase behavior is most influenced by affective commitment and perceived efficacy, while materialism affects firm behavior and consumption volume.
This study examines factors related to socially responsible consumption based on a sample of 636 Spanish consumers. The results indicate that socio-demographic factors such as sex, age, education level, and economic activity affect responsible consumption. In addition, it was found that in order to assess the antecedents of socially responsible consumption it is necessary to specify the type of consumer behavior (for example, purchasing specific products or initiatives against the purchase of certain products). It is found that perceived efficacy, affective commitment, and materialism explain different levels of variance in socially responsible consumption. Purchasing cause-related products is most influenced by affective commitment and perceived efficacy. Materialism affects purchasing motivated by firm behavior and the volume of consumption. The study finds that the referents to the responsibility that consumers adopt can be explained independently. In conclusion, with the aim of supporting a more sustainable society, the need for studies on anti-consumption behaviors as an instrument for sustainability is stressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available