4.2 Review

Circular Sustainability of Sugarcane: Natural, Nutritious, and Functional Unrefined Sweeteners That Meet New Consumer Demands

Journal

SUGAR TECH
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 964-973

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-021-00994-4

Keywords

Sustainability; Sugarcane; Natural sweeteners; Cane sugars; Organic sugars

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sucrose has been under scrutiny in the past decade mainly due to its calories, although it remains one of the most widely used natural sweeteners. As consumers increasingly seek healthier and more natural food options, sucrose and less refined sugars from sugarcane are being recognized as natural sweeteners with greater nutritional value.
Sucrose has been greatly scrutinized in the past decade mainly for its calories, even though sales have increased globally and it still remains sustainable as the gold standard of sweeteners as well as the most widely used sweetener. Ironically, the present and accelerating consumer-driven trend toward healthier, sustainably produced, and more natural foods and ingredients has started to further redeem sucrose and less refined sugars from sugarcane as natural sweeteners. Natural sweeteners, as compared to artificial and highly processed calorie sweeteners, are the least processed and contain a greater range and higher quantity of nutrients, including antioxidants, minerals, and vitamins. Unrefined, brown sugars from sugarcane are having huge growth as natural sweeteners. They include centrifuged and non-centrifuged cane sugars that are markedly less expensive yet equally if not more nutritious than other natural sweeteners, including solid sugars from coconut palm, honey, maple, date, stevia, and monk fruit. In response to these new consumer demands, the sugarcane industry is increasingly implementing sustainable practices to supply natural cane sugars, following a circular (evergreen or 360-degree) approach which spans the entire product life cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available