4.1 Review

Take my breath away: studying pathogen invasion of the human lung using primary tissue models

Journal

PATHOGENS AND DISEASE
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftab016

Keywords

hAMs; hPCLS; pulmonary; lung; lung infection; intracellular bacteria

Funding

  1. NIH/NIAID [R21AI144508, R21AI142056]
  2. NIH/NIGMS [P20GM103625]
  3. Arkansas Biosciences Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human pulmonary environment is complex, with a variety of cells that mount a strong response against pathogens, but some bacterial pathogens exploit this environment for replication and survival. Current lack of human disease-relevant model systems for studying these bacterial infections in the lung presents a challenge.
The human pulmonary environment is complex, containing a matrix of cells, including fibroblasts, epithelial cells, interstitial macrophages, alveolar macrophages and neutrophils. When confronted with foreign material or invading pathogens, these cells mount a robust response. Nevertheless, many bacterial pathogens with an intracellular lifecycle stage exploit this environment for replication and survival. These include, but are not limited to, Coxiella burnetii, Legionella pneumophila, Yersinia pestis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Staphylococcus aureus. Currently, few human disease-relevant model systems exist for studying host-pathogen interactions during these bacterial infections in the lung. Here, we present two novel infection platforms, human alveolar macrophages (hAMs) and human precision-cut lung slices (hPCLS), along with an up-to-date synopsis of research using said models. Additionally, alternative uses for these systems in the absence of pathogen involvement are presented, such as tissue banking and further characterization of the human lung environment. Overall, hAMs and hPCLS allow novel human disease-relevant investigations that other models, such as cell lines and animal models, cannot completely provide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available