4.6 Article

Development of a Wearable Glove System with Multiple Sensors for Hand Kinematics Assessment

Journal

MICROMACHINES
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi12040362

Keywords

hand rehabilitation; data glove; inertial sensors; kinematics evaluation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61501226, 61803201, 61673278]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661686]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality Projects [JCYJ20190808181803703]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics [NT2020008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a novel wearable glove system for hand function assessment, which uses sensors to capture hand movements and a complementary filter algorithm to calculate joint angles, while also developing a virtual hand model. Experimental results demonstrate that this smart glove system can accurately capture and reproduce human hand motions, potentially reducing the complexity and time consumption of hand kinematics assessment.
In traditional hand function assessment, patients and physicians always need to accomplish complex activities and rating tasks. This paper proposes a novel wearable glove system for hand function assessment. A sensing system consisting of 12 nine-axis inertial and magnetic unit (IMMU) sensors is used to obtain the acceleration, angular velocity, and geomagnetic orientation of human hand movements. A complementary filter algorithm is applied to calculate the angles of joints after sensor calibration. A virtual hand model is also developed to map with the glove system in the Unity platform. The experimental results show that this glove system can capture and reproduce human hand motions with high accuracy. This smart glove system is expected to reduce the complexity and time consumption of hand kinematics assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available