4.4 Article

Free energy and defect C-theorem in free scalar theory

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)074

Keywords

Conformal Field Theory; Anomalies in Field and String Theories; Renormalization Group

Funding

  1. JSPS [19K03863, 16H02182]
  2. National Center of Theoretical Sciences (NCTS)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K03863, 16H02182] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study describes conformal defects of p dimensions in a free scalar theory as boundary conditions on the conformally flat space H(p+1)x?(d-p-1), classifying them into Dirichlet type and Neumann type. It is found that Dirichlet boundary conditions always exist, while Neumann boundary conditions are only allowed for defects of lower codimensions. The results are consistent with a recent classification of non-monodromy defects, highlighting the association of Neumann boundary conditions with non-trivial defects.
We describe conformal defects of p dimensions in a free scalar theory on a d-dimensional flat space as boundary conditions on the conformally flat space H(p+1)x ?(d-p-1). We classify two types of boundary conditions, Dirichlet type and Neumann type, on the boundary of the subspace Hp+1 which correspond to the types of conformal defects in the free scalar theory. We find Dirichlet boundary conditions always exist while Neumann boundary conditions are allowed only for defects of lower codimensions. Our results match with a recent classification of the non-monodromy defects, showing Neumann boundary conditions are associated with non-trivial defects. We check this observation by calculating the difference of the free energies on H(p+1)x ?(d-p-1) between Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. We also examine the defect RG flows from Neumann to Dirichlet boundary conditions and provide more support for a conjectured C-theorem in defect CFTs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available