4.6 Review

Recent advances of metal phosphides for Li-S chemistry

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 533-548

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.020

Keywords

Metal phosphides; Li-S chemistry; Polysulfide regulation; Electrocatalysis

Funding

  1. Project of State Key Laboratory of Environment-Friendly Energy Materials (SWUST, China) [19FKSY16, 18ZD320304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li-S batteries, with high theoretical capacity and energy density, face challenges such as lithium polysulfide shuttle and slow sulfur reaction kinetics. Progress in phosphides-optimized Li-S chemistry has shown promise in addressing these issues.
Li-S batteries have been considered as one of advanced next-generation energy storage systems owing to their remarkable theoretical capacity (1672 mAh g(-1)) and high energy density (2600 Wh kg(-1)). However, critical issues, mainly pertaining to lithium polysulfide shuttle and slow sulfur reaction kinetics, have posed a fatal threat to the electrochemical performances of Li-S batteries. The situation is even worse for high sulfur-loaded and flexible cathodes, which are the essential components for practical Li-S batteries. In response, the use of metal compounds as electrocatalysts in Li-S systems have been confirmed as an effective strategy to date. Particularly, recent years have witnessed many progresses in phosphides-optimized Li-S chemistry. This has been motivated by the superior electron conductivity and high electrocatalytic activity of phosphides. In this tutorial review, we offer a systematic summary of active metal phosphides as promoters for Li-S chemistry, aiming at helping to understanding the working mechanism of phosphide electrocatalysts and guiding the construction of advanced Li-S batteries. (C) 2020 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available