4.5 Article

On the Influence of the Sample Properties on the Measurement of the Implied Open-Circuit Voltage

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 715-724

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3053094

Keywords

Doping; Passivation; Voltage measurement; Semiconductor device modeling; Lighting; Semiconductor process modeling; Surface morphology; Circuit simulation; inductance measurements; silicon devices; voltage measurements

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy [03EE1031A, 03EE1032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The implied voltage iV(OC) is a crucial parameter for evaluating the electronic quality of solar cell test samples, but it can be significantly influenced by various factors such as sample properties and interface quality. This study demonstrates that even minor changes in sample properties can result in a notable deviation in iV(OC), and when multiple influences are combined, this difference can further amplify.
The implied voltage iV(OC) is a popular parameter for the electronic quality of solar cell test samples. It is used to characterize properties like the passivation quality of surface coatings. While iV(OC) fundamentally depends on the sample properties besides the electronic quality of the interface, such influences have not been systematically quantified and are usually not stated, which questions the comparability of iV(OC) across multiple sample sets. This article is dedicated to study the influence of the wafer doping and thickness, surface passivation and reflection as well as light trapping on iV(OC) by device simulations using Quokka3, supported by experimental data. It is shown that, even moderate changes in these sample properties can result in a significant deviation in iV(OC). This is emphasized if multiple influences are combined, as shown on two samples featuring an iV(OC) of 737 and 754 mV. This difference in iV(OC) can be broken down into individual contributions, demonstrating how the aforementioned influences can quickly add up to 10-15 mV if combined. From this perspective, it is difficult to compare their respective surface passivation performance, which only accounts for less than 10% of the total change in iV(OC). Therefore, we recommend a precise description of the aforementioned sample properties when reporting iV(OC) values in publication. To quantify the surface recombination, we recommend the use of J(0s) instead of iV(OC), since it specifically describes surface recombination and is usually independent from the discussed sample properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available