4.7 Article

Visualizing the Integrity of Chloroplast Envelope by Rhodamine and Nile Red Staining

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.668414

Keywords

chloroplast isolation; chloroplast integrity; envelope; staining; Rhodamine; Nile red

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070696, 31570182]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By staining the chloroplast envelope with fluorescent dyes, such as Rhodamine or Nile red, the integrity of isolated chloroplasts can be easily checked and distinguished between broken and intact chloroplasts. This method is convenient, quick, and can effectively prevent errors caused by broken chloroplasts in experiments.
Chloroplasts are essential organelles in plant cells with many important functions. Chloroplasts isolated by Percoll density gradient centrifugation are widely used in the study of chloroplasts. The intactness of isolated chloroplasts is necessary for many of the experiments. In the past, those isolated chloroplasts were either simply believed to be intact or had to be analyzed by indirect biochemical methods. Here we show a new method to check the intactness of isolated chloroplasts by staining their envelope with fluorescent dyes, Rhodamine or Nile red, and then observing them with a fluorescence microscope. With this method, broken chloroplasts and intact chloroplasts can be distinguished easily and their integrity can be checked in a few minutes. Results of this method agreed well with those of biochemical methods. Moreover, we have also found that sometimes the middle layer chloroplasts from the Percoll gradient centrifugation could be mostly broken, which could cause mistakes in the experiment. With our method, this problem can be easily found. This chloroplast envelope staining method can be used in the preparation of isolated chloroplasts to ensure the intactness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available