4.8 Article

Probing the decision-making mechanisms underlying choice between drug and nondrug rewards in rats

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.64993

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-2010-BLAN-1404-01]
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [FRM DPA20140629788]
  3. Peter und Traudl Engelhorn Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the decision-making mechanisms between drug and nondrug rewards by comparing response latencies during sampling and choice trials. Rats engage deliberative decision-making mechanisms after limited training, but adopt a habit-like response selection mechanism after extended training. The DCM and SCM may not be general choice models, but can be dynamically engaged to control choice behavior during early and extended training.
Delineating the decision-making mechanisms underlying choice between drug and nondrug rewards remains a challenge. This study adopts an original approach to probe these mechanisms by comparing response latencies during sampling versus choice trials. While lengthening of latencies during choice is predicted in a deliberative choice model (DCM), the race-like response competition mechanism postulated by the Sequential choice model (SCM) predicts a shortening of latencies during choice compared to sampling. Here, we tested these predictions by conducting a retrospective analysis of cocaine-versus-saccharin choice experiments conducted in our laboratory. We found that rats engage deliberative decision-making mechanisms after limited training, but adopt a SCM-like response selection mechanism after more extended training, while their behavior is presumably habitual. Thus, the DCM and SCM may not be general models of choice, as initially formulated, but could be dynamically engaged to control choice behavior across early and extended training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available