4.8 Article

How oscillating aerodynamic forces explain the timbre of the hummingbird's hum and other animals in flapping flight

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.63107

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award [1552419]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  3. Stanford University Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  4. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Research Program ZERO [P15-06]
  5. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that the humming sound of hummingbirds arises from the lift and drag forces on their wings, supporting their body weight. Comparing birds and insects, larger birds tend to be quieter while elongated flies are louder, explaining complex bioacoustic behavior.
How hummingbirds hum is not fully understood, but its biophysical origin is encoded in the acoustic nearfield. Hence, we studied six freely hovering Anna's hummingbirds, performing acoustic nearfield holography using a 2176 microphone array in vivo, while also directly measuring the 3D aerodynamic forces using a new aerodynamic force platform. We corroborate the acoustic measurements by developing an idealized acoustic model that integrates the aerodynamic forces with wing kinematics, which shows how the timbre of the hummingbird's hum arises from the oscillating lift and drag forces on each wing. Comparing birds and insects, we find that the characteristic humming timbre and radiated power of their flapping wings originates from the higher harmonics in the aerodynamic forces that support their bodyweight. Our model analysis across insects and birds shows that allometric deviation makes larger birds quieter and elongated flies louder, while also clarifying complex bioacoustic behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available