4.6 Review

The role of DNA methylation in syndromic and non-syndromic congenital heart disease

Journal

CLINICAL EPIGENETICS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01077-7

Keywords

Congenital heart disease; DNA methylation; Genome methylation level; Differentially methylated regions; Maternal factors

Funding

  1. Joint Funds for Health and Education, Fujian Province [2019-WJ-35]
  2. Joint Research Project of Important and Critical Diseases, Xiamen City [3502Z20179050]
  3. National Science Fund [81472031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a common structural birth defect worldwide, with the etiology of most cases remaining unknown. Increasing evidence suggests that aberrant DNA methylation may be related to CHD.
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a common structural birth defect worldwide, and defects typically occur in the walls and valves of the heart or enlarged blood vessels. Chromosomal abnormalities and genetic mutations only account for a small portion of the pathogenic mechanisms of CHD, and the etiology of most cases remains unknown. The role of epigenetics in various diseases, including CHD, has attracted increased attention. The contributions of DNA methylation, one of the most important epigenetic modifications, to CHD have not been illuminated. Increasing evidence suggests that aberrant DNA methylation is related to CHD. Here, we briefly introduce DNA methylation and CHD and then review the DNA methylation profiles during cardiac development and in CHD, abnormalities in maternal genome-wide DNA methylation patterns are also described. Whole genome methylation profile and important differentially methylated genes identified in recent years are summarized and clustered according to the sample type and methodologies. Finally, we discuss the novel technology for and prospects of CHD-related DNA methylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available