4.5 Article

Regional brain volumes, diffusivity, and metabolite changes after electroconvulsive therapy for severe depression

Journal

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 133, Issue 2, Pages 154-164

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12462

Keywords

depression; electroconvulsive therapy; hippocampus; magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion tensor imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Categories

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Lundbeck Foundation [R62-2010-5364, R67-2010-6363] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the role of hippocampal plasticity in the antidepressant effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Method: We used magnetic resonance (MR) imaging including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and proton MR spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) to investigate hippocampal volume, diffusivity, and metabolite changes in 19 patients receiving ECT for severe depression. Other regions of interest included the amygdala, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), orbitofrontal cortex, and hypothalamus. Patients received a 3T MR scan before ECT (TP1), 1 week (TP2), and 4 weeks (TP3) after ECT. Results: Hippocampal and amygdala volume increased significantly at TP2 and continued to be increased at TP3. DLPFC exhibited a transient volume reduction at TP2. DTI revealed a reduced anisotropy and diffusivity of the hippocampus at TP2. We found no significant post-ECT changes in brain metabolite concentrations, and we were unable to identify a spectral signature at approximate to 1.30 ppm previously suggested to reflect neurogenesis induced by ECT. None of the brain imaging measures correlated to the clinical response. Conclusion: Our findings show that ECT causes a remodeling of brain structures involved in affective regulation, but due to their lack of correlation with the antidepressant effect, this remodeling does not appear to be directly underlying the antidepressant action of ECT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available