4.5 Article

Organic Molecular Tracers in PM2.5 at Urban Sites during Spring and Summer in Japan: Impact of Secondary Organic Aerosols on Water-Soluble Organic Carbon

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos12050579

Keywords

SOA; organic markers; WSOC; potential ozone; SOA-tracer method

Funding

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund [JPMEERF20185001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that the impact of secondary organic aerosols on water-soluble organic carbon is significant in urban areas in Japan during both spring and summer, with different sources of SOAs affecting WSOC to varying degrees.
To understand the characteristics of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) and estimate their impact on water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) in urban areas in Japan, we measured 17 organic tracers using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry from particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 mu m collected at five urban sites in Japan during spring and summer. Most anthropogenic, monoterpene-derived, and isoprene-derived SOA tracers showed meaningful correlations with potential ozone in both these seasons. These results indicate that oxidants play an important role in SOAs produced during both seasons in urban cities in Japan. WSOC was significantly affected by anthropogenic and monoterpene-derived SOAs during spring and three SOA groups during summer at most of the sites sampled. The total estimated secondary organic carbons (SOCs), including mono-aromatic, di-aromatic, monoterpene-derived, and isoprene-derived SOCs, could explain the WSOC fractions of 39-63% in spring and 46-54% in summer at each site. Notably, monoterpene-derived and mono-aromatic SOCs accounted for most of the total estimated SOCs in both spring (85-93%) and summer (75-82%) at each site. These results indicate that SOAs significantly impact WSOC concentrations during both these seasons at urban sites in Japan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available