4.7 Article

A Robust and Fast Collision-Avoidance Approach for Micro Aerial Vehicles Using a Depth Sensor

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13091796

Keywords

micro aerial vehicles; collision-avoidance; distance field; depth sensor

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [RTI2018-100847-B-C21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a depth-based collision-avoidance method for aerial robots, enabling high-speed flights in dynamic environments. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has robust performance in challenging dynamic environments.
Collision-avoidance is a crucial research topic in robotics. Designing a collision-avoidance algorithm is still a challenging and open task, because of the requirements for navigating in unstructured and dynamic environments using limited payload and computing resources on board micro aerial vehicles. This article presents a novel depth-based collision-avoidance method for aerial robots, enabling high-speed flights in dynamic environments. First of all, a depth-based Euclidean distance field mapping algorithm is generated. Then, the proposed Euclidean distance field mapping strategy is integrated with a rapid-exploration random tree to construct a collision-avoidance system. The experimental results show that the proposed collision-avoidance algorithm has a robust performance at high flight speeds in challenging dynamic environments. The experimental results show that the proposed collision-avoidance algorithm can perform faster collision-avoidance maneuvers when compared to the state-of-art algorithms (the average computing time of the collision maneuver is 25.4 ms, while the minimum computing time is 10.4 ms). The average computing time is six times faster than one baseline algorithm. Additionally, fully autonomous flight experiments are also conducted for validating the presented collision-avoidance approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available