4.7 Article

Profiling Dust Mass Concentration in Northwest China Using a Joint Lidar and Sun-Photometer Setting

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13061099

Keywords

dust mass concentration; mass extinction efficiency; identification and separation of dust aerosol; lidar-photometer method; Northwest China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41775022, 41521004]
  2. Strategic PriorityResearch ProgramofChineseAcademy of Sciences [XDA2006010 301]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2020-kb02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Satellite-based estimation of dust mass concentration (DMC) is crucial for global biogeochemical cycle assessment of dust aerosols. A classic lidar-photometer method effectively identifies and separates dust from pollutants, revealing a negative correlation between dust mass extinction efficiency (MEE) and particle size. Results suggest that considering the variation of MEE with dust particle size is important in accurately estimating DMC.
The satellite-based estimation of the dust mass concentration (DMC) is essential for accurately evaluating the global biogeochemical cycle of the dust aerosols. As for the uncertainties in estimating DMC caused by mixing dust and pollutants and assuming a fixed value for the mass extinction efficiency (MEE), a classic lidar-photometer method is employed to identify and separate the dust from pollutants, obtain the dust MEE, and evaluate the effect of the above uncertainties, during five dust field experiments in Northwest China. Our results show that this method is effective for continental aerosol mixtures consisting of dust and pollutants. It is also seen that the dust loading mainly occurred in the free troposphere (<6 km), with the average mass loading of 905 +/- 635 mu g m(-2) trapped in the planetary boundary layer. The dust MEE ranges from 0.30 to 0.60 m(2) g(-1) and has a significantly negative relationship with the size of dust particles. With the assumption of the dust MEE of 0.37 (0.60) m(2) g(-1), the DMC is shown to be overestimated (underestimated) by 20-40% (15-30%). In other words, our results suggest that the change of MEE with the size of dust particles should be considered in the estimation of DMC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available