4.7 Article

Determining the Optimal Conditions for the Production by Supercritical CO2 of Biodegradable PLGA Foams for the Controlled Release of Rutin as a Medical Treatment

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13101645

Keywords

PLGA; supercritical CO2 foaming; rutin; scaffolds; release profile

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [CTQ2017-86661-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(D,L,-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) foam samples impregnated with rutin were produced by supercritical foaming processes. The study showed that increasing pressure facilitated greater impregnation of rutin into the polymer foam pores, and modifying certain variables resulted in considerable differences in the drug release profiles.
Poly(D,L,-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) foam samples impregnated with rutin were successfully produced by supercritical foaming processes. A number of parameters such as pressure (80-200 bar), temperature (35-55 degrees C), depressurization rate (5-100 bar/min), ratio lactide:glycolide of the poly(D,L,-lactide-co-glycolide) (50:50 and 75:25) were studied to determine their effect on the expansion factor and on the glass transition temperature of the polymer foams and their consequences on the release profile of the rutin entrapped in them. The impregnated foams were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and mercury intrusion porosimetry. A greater impregnation of rutin into the polymer foam pores was observed as pressure was increased. The release of rutin in a phosphate buffer solution was investigated. The controlled release tests confirmed that the modification of certain variables would result in considerable differences in the drug release profiles. Thus, five-day drug release periods were achieved under high pressure and temperature while the depressurization rate remained low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available