4.7 Article

Preparation of Porous Hydroxyapatite Using Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide as Surfactant for the Removal of Lead Ions from Aquatic Solutions

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13101617

Keywords

adsorption; lead; hydroxyapatite; CTAB; removal; ultrasound studies

Funding

  1. Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation [PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0629, 43PCCDI/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new low-cost bioceramic nanocomposite based on porous hydroxyapatite and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide was successfully obtained and characterized for its ability to remove lead ions from aqueous solutions. Cytotoxicity assays indicated no significant toxic effects on cells.
In the present study, a new low-cost bioceramic nanocomposite based on porous hydroxyapatite (HAp) and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) as surfactant was successfully obtained by a simple chemical co-precipitation. The composition and structure of the HAp-CTAB were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer, and N-2 adsorption/desorption analysis. The capacity of HAp-CTAB nanocomposites to remove the lead ions from aqueous solutions was studied by adsorption batch experiments and proved by Langmuir and Freundlich models. The Pb2+ removal efficiency of HAp-CTAB biocomposite was also confirmed by non-destructive ultrasound studies. The cytotoxicity assays showed that the HAp-CTAB nanocomposites did not induce any significant morphological changes of HeLa cells after 24 h of incubation or other toxic effects. Taken together, our results suggests that the obtained porous HAp-CTAB powder could be used for the decontamination of water polluted with heavy metals, such as Pb2+.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available